Ed Compass, SmartTech, Oct 2012
Promote 21st century skills with your SMART Board and Spongelab
__________________________________________________________________
Ed Compass, SmartTech, Oct 2012
Promote 21st century skills with your SMART Board and Spongelab
__________________________________________________________________
Drove up to Fredericton in TERRIBLE RAIN (Thanks Marcel) to attend a virtual conference, face to face. Virtual is good. Face to face is better!! Had I attended virtually, I probably would have interacted with Bryan Facey and Jeff Whipple. But I would not have sat beside Heather Hallett and talked about Partners In Learning and I would not have met a great BBT teacher to design a collaborative Chemistry Google Sketchup project!!
Tech is cool, but face to face is CRUCIAL!!
My work was featured by name in David Warlick’s Keynote at the MAINEducation 2012 conference. Thanks so much. I have many more things since we last talked.
Just finished the SMART Technology Free course on Cyberbullying.
It was short, sweet, useful and productive. They talked about practical things on how you can prevent cyberbullying. I knew about e=mail and filters. What I had never considered was setting the ring tones of the bullies to silent. I also did not know that there was an app for that so that calls and texts from individuals are never received except to put them in a folder to be used as evidence. I like it!!
Last year, I downloaded the HISTORY of BIOLOGY from SPONGELABS. It was great!! I loved the game itself. The graphics were wonderful and the tasks were stimulating. Students worked away at the puzzles learning seemingly unconnected topics in biology by solving puzzles. It is sort of a scavenger hunt, meets National Treasure and AP Biology. However, as you get further into the game, you start to see how all the pieces fit together. This is analogous to learning science. You do not always know why something will be useful and then at some point in time later, it is the crucial piece of the puzzle. It is a nice analogy to science.
Particularly interesting was the combination of the HISTORY of BIOLOGY with a SMARTBoard. Half of the class worked on the game as individuals on laptops while the other half of the class worked in small teams of 3 and 4 at SMARTBoards. It was fascinating to watch the teams work together to solve the game. Although the students at 1:1 laptops were in close proximity and gathered around tables, their interactions were very limited. Just because students are arranged in a collaborative shape, each with their own tech, working on the same problem does not mean that they will actually COLLABRATE. However, the students gathered around the boards were talking, discussing, in some cases arguing, and working as a team. The SMARTboards improved the communication and the social constructivism. The SMARTBoards turned an activity that uses technology into a 21st Century Learning activity by encouraging all those 21C skills such as communication, critical thinking, media literacy and the like.
Some educators have been looking at SMARTBoards as TPR’s- Traditional Pedagogy Replicators. Combining the HISTORY of BIOLOGY game from Spongelabs, with SMARTBoards is a wonderful example of how the boards can transform STUDENT learning. The key is having students using the boards with wonderful resources like the HISTORY of BIOLOGY.
I just completed the “SMART Interactive Teacher Certification”. There is some real synergy between the products at SMART for Education. Each little piece may not seem that valuable at first glance, with the exception of the SMART Boards and Notebook, but when they are all pieced together they are more than the sum of their parts. It has been fun getting outside of my own rut. Thanks!!
Here is a cool widget so you can search Smart Exchange right from your own web page.
In the last two weeks, I have received 2 very important emails from previous students. Today I received this email from a previous student, now in her 3rd year at a prestigious university BSc Chemistry Degree.
Our school has not ranked near the top where we believe it to be based on reports from our university friends and scholarship money. One of the reasons is that we offer few AP courses and no IB courses. We believe that growing brains requires flexibility, has little to do with the amount of content and programs are too confining.
The second email comes from another previous student now in her first year at a nationally renowned university in the center of the continent full of AP and IB graduates.
This entry is about the idea of not giving students “stuff” or directions to allow space in which they can innovate. Less direction or help is more. Don’t crowd the students out of their creativity and innovation.
On Friday, I told my students we would use wave tables to study Reflection, Refraction and Diffraction. Although the information is presented in text, many youtube videos and online, you need to pretend that you are the first ones to study this to maintain the hard work of brain growing. If no one has done this before, how can I give you a procedure? Tell me something about waves. They have 3 days to do what woud normally take only 1.
Day 1 is for assembling the table, playing, trying to figure out what supplies are needed and create a plan. Day 2 is to conduct the lab. Day 3 is wrap up, clean up and organize the wright up.
The really interesting day was today,…day 2. Some groups forgot protractors and rulers. They were surprised when I did not have supplies for them as backup. I am willing to let them fail small. There is some responsibility on their part. But it extends beyond a life lesson.
When their light did not work, I did not try to solve it. I sympathized and asked how they were going to fix it? “you mean you don’t have a back up?”
“Nope…I do not.” This is important. Rather than have a solution presented to them, they figured it out. They improvised a cell phone with LED light. The result was a doubling of the viewing surface, better clarity for data collection and most importantly, real satisfaction and pride in solving the problem on their own.
Another group asked about amplitude. “Can we measure amplitude?”-student
“Sure” and I started to walk away.
“No, how do we measure amplitude?”-student?
“I do not know and I have no machine”, while I was thinking of about three ways to do it.
About 15 minutes later a very excited student runs up and says,”We figured it out. You couldn’t and we did!!” he then explained their innovative solution. Although I could have told them earlier, and they would have had a procedure to collect data better, it would not have been theirs. They created, innovated and were excited.
Too often, we as teachers want to help, we want to find, and we want to provide..particularly if the students are excited. I wonder if we crowd the students too much and do not leave enough space for students to be creative and innovate. Of course the art of teaching is knowing when the space is too large and they quit.